tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2510028102835351108.post1410172661163107958..comments2022-12-12T06:08:43.230-08:00Comments on The View from Tab: More on judge assignmentUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2510028102835351108.post-32919641664169351002009-11-01T07:17:19.495-08:002009-11-01T07:17:19.495-08:00We usually have a ratio of 1 to 3.We usually have a ratio of 1 to 3.Jim Menickhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02355203810752396632noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2510028102835351108.post-15778816629591810812009-10-30T13:59:59.486-07:002009-10-30T13:59:59.486-07:00How big of a pool of judges do you have for a fiel...How big of a pool of judges do you have for a field of 100? 50 judges? 25? I think my answer depends largely on the size of the judging pool, more than the field. Something like a strike range of 20-30% sounds reasonable - because that allows teams to strike a high number of judges. Assuming you had a 1 judge for every two competitors and pool of 50 judges - that would mean something like 15 strikes. <br /><br />That's a high number, but it shouldn't be inoperable. Assume the worst case and that Madison Memorial and Hen Hud struck 15 different judges and we're debating in round six; there should be about 10 different judges that could fit into that round.Nick Bubbhttp://njbubb.wordpress.comnoreply@blogger.com