This week the Harpo, Groucho, Chico and Zeppo discuss speaker points in all their glory. The problem is, of course, that there are no objective criteria. We also raked MJP over the metaphoric coals in light of Big Bronx. The episode is here.
And this is the Bietz speaker point scale that I found a little stingy:
This scale is what a judge should use based on the ROUND itself, not the person's potential or reputation.
30= Perfect. Judges should think REALLY hard before giving a thirty.
29= Nearly perfect - Debated well enough in the round to win every tournament they attend. No mistakes.
27-28= Very good. Debated well enough to break and make it to deep outrounds. Could have beat 90% of the pool.
26= Good. Should end up with a winning record.
25= Average. Should be somewhere between 2-4 or 3-3.
24= Not good. Made a lot of mistakes. Spoke poorly.
23= Awful. Shouldn't win more than 1 round based on what you saw here.
22 and lower = offended you.
Thursday, October 21, 2010
Monday, October 11, 2010
TFVT launches War on Drugs
So the Four Corners of the Debate Earth tackled the Nov-Dec resolution last night, with decidedly mixed results. Find out which word in the resolution ultimately drove us into the wall. Episode 30
During the discussion I mentioned some material I had picked up from Filip Spagnoli's blog (which you may not be aware of, if you don't follow the Coachean Feed, which you also may not be aware of, which is a tragedy of epic proportions).
http://filipspagnoli.wordpress.com/stats-on-human-rights/statistics-on-freedom/statistics-on-prisoner-population-rates/#4
http://filipspagnoli.wordpress.com/2010/08/27/human-rights-facts-193-does-being-tough-on-crime-reduce-crime/
http://www.economist.com/node/16636027?story_id=16636027
Oh, yeah. The feed. I've plugged it in there over on the right. The best thing to do is follow it through RSS.
During the discussion I mentioned some material I had picked up from Filip Spagnoli's blog (which you may not be aware of, if you don't follow the Coachean Feed, which you also may not be aware of, which is a tragedy of epic proportions).
http://filipspagnoli.wordpress.com/stats-on-human-rights/statistics-on-freedom/statistics-on-prisoner-population-rates/#4
http://filipspagnoli.wordpress.com/2010/08/27/human-rights-facts-193-does-being-tough-on-crime-reduce-crime/
http://www.economist.com/node/16636027?story_id=16636027
Oh, yeah. The feed. I've plugged it in there over on the right. The best thing to do is follow it through RSS.
Friday, October 1, 2010
You heard it here first
That is, you heard Menick retching when discussing what is now the Nov-Dec topic. Hear what the Four Feathers (Menick, Cruz, Bietz and Palmer) have to say about all of the potential resolutions in Episode 29.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)